December 22, 2024

Delhi Court Summons Wikipedia Users in Defamation Case Against ANI

The Delhi High Court has directed summons to be issued to individuals accused of making defamatory edits to the Wikipedia page of Asian News International (ANI). This follows ANI’s legal action alleging that Wikipedia allowed its platform to host and publish harmful statements against the organization. The court has mandated the summons to be served through all possible methods, including email addresses provided confidentially by Wikipedia.

During the proceedings, the Wikimedia Foundation assured the court of its compliance in safeguarding the identities of the users involved by submitting the data in a sealed cover. The court required this submission to ensure privacy while progressing with the defamation suit. Justice Subramonium Prasad presided over the matter, emphasizing adherence to the terms agreed upon by both ANI and Wikipedia in a prior Division Bench consent order.

ANI had initially approached the court in July, seeking disclosure of the identities of three individuals responsible for the contentious edits. The case gained momentum after ANI claimed that Wikipedia had failed to comply with a court directive to remove defamatory content and provide necessary information about the editors. This led to a contempt of court notice being issued against Wikipedia, with the platform’s representative summoned to appear in court in October.

Subsequent appeals by Wikipedia to the Division Bench resulted in an agreement. Wikipedia committed to serving legal notices to the users without compromising their anonymity. This arrangement allowed the legal process to advance while protecting user privacy, a key point argued by Wikipedia’s counsel throughout the hearings.

The defamation case has drawn attention to the accountability of online platforms for user-generated content. ANI’s legal team contends that platforms like Wikipedia must act swiftly to address defamatory content, particularly when notified. On the other hand, Wikipedia’s defense centers on the balance between user privacy and legal obligations, highlighting the complexities faced by platforms in moderating content in a vast, collaborative environment.


Notice an issue?


Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don’t hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.